Ceridian HCM and Smead Value C are two companies recently compared in terms of their stock performance and ownership structures. This analysis highlights key differences in institutional and insider ownership, volatility, profitability, and overall financial metrics.
Ownership Breakdown
Institutional investors hold a significant stake in Smead Value C, owning 60.2% of its shares. In contrast, company insiders own only 10.3% of the shares. For Ceridian HCM, the insider ownership is notably lower, at just 4.5%. High institutional ownership typically indicates confidence from large money managers and hedge funds in a company’s potential for long-term growth.
Volatility and Risk Assessment
When examining volatility, Smead Value C presents a beta of 0.11, indicating that its stock price is 89% less volatile than the S&P 500 index. This suggests a more stable investment profile. Conversely, Ceridian HCM has a beta of 1.38, meaning its stock is 38% more volatile than the S&P 500, which may appeal to investors seeking higher risk and potentially higher returns.
Profitability metrics further differentiate the two companies. Smead Value C showcases higher earnings than Ceridian HCM, but it generates lower revenue overall. This contrast in financial performance emphasizes the distinct operational strategies of both firms.
Company Profiles
Smead Value C, also known as SVF Investment Corp. 3, was incorporated in 2020 and is based in San Carlos, California. The company primarily focuses on executing mergers and acquisitions, without significant operations at this time. It operated under the name SVF Investment III Corp. until January 2021.
On the other hand, Ceridian HCM Holding Inc. operates as a human capital management (HCM) software company, providing services in the United States, Canada, and internationally. Ceridian’s flagship product, Dayforce, offers a comprehensive cloud-based platform for human resources, payroll, benefits, workforce management, and talent management. Additionally, the company provides Powerpay, a cloud HR and payroll solution aimed at small businesses. Founded in 2013 and headquartered in Minneapolis, Minnesota, Ceridian utilizes a combination of direct sales and third-party channels for distribution.
In summary, Ceridian HCM surpasses Smead Value C in five out of eight key metrics analyzed in this comparison. Investors looking for stability may find Smead Value C appealing due to its low volatility, while those interested in growth potential may lean towards Ceridian HCM’s higher risk profile and broader service offerings. The contrasting characteristics of these two companies provide a diverse range of investment opportunities for stakeholders in the market.
