UPDATE: Former Vice President Kamala Harris praised Supreme Court Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson during a public statement on Wednesday, calling her dissents “must-reads” and “brilliant.” This declaration comes amid a heated online debate regarding Jackson’s judicial style and competence.
Harris, who played a significant role in President Biden’s selection of Jackson for the Supreme Court, urged the public to engage with Jackson’s writings, stating, “I encourage everyone to read her dissents. They are brilliant.” This endorsement is drawing sharp reactions across social media platforms, with critics questioning the merit of Jackson’s arguments.
The statement coincided with rising scrutiny over Jackson’s judicial decisions, particularly following a recent oral argument session where she expressed controversial views about executive power, suggesting that “unelected bureaucrats” should have substantial authority in governance. This has led to backlash from various political commentators who argue her reasoning lacks grounding in established legal principles.
Critics, including some who typically align with progressive values, are voicing skepticism about both Harris’s and Jackson’s qualifications. Many have taken to social media to express disbelief at the praise, with remarks surfacing about their perceived disconnect from legal norms. Harris’s support for Jackson is seen by some as further complicating her own political future, especially as she reportedly gears up for another presidential run.
“To say Jackson is in over her head is an understatement,”
a commentator remarked on social media, reflecting the sentiments of those who oppose Harris’s endorsement of Jackson’s judicial philosophy.
As this situation develops, it raises questions not only about Jackson’s influence on the Court but also about Harris’s political strategy as she eyes a potential comeback in the 2024 presidential race. Observers are eagerly watching how these dynamics will unfold in the coming weeks.
This unfolding drama highlights the critical intersection of politics and the judiciary in the United States, and how public opinions can shift rapidly in response to declarations from high-profile figures like Kamala Harris. The implications of these statements could resonate throughout the political landscape as both women navigate their respective roles in a polarized environment.
With the 2024 election cycle approaching, Harris’s comments about Jackson may be more than just a show of support; they could significantly impact her political capital as she attempts to reclaim momentum in a challenging landscape.
Stay tuned for more updates on this developing story.
