Intel has firmly rejected allegations from Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company (TSMC) regarding a potential breach of trade secrets. The controversy centers around former TSMC executive Lo Wei-jen, who joined Intel in October 2023. TSMC claims that Lo disclosed proprietary information related to its advanced 2nm production process during his transition to the US chipmaker.
Addressing the allegations, Intel stated that it implements stringent measures to safeguard sensitive information and intellectual property. The company emphasized there is no evidence to suggest these protocols were violated when Lo transitioned to Intel. According to a report by Reuters, Intel reiterated that the movement of skilled personnel within the semiconductor sector is common practice.
TSMC’s concerns stem from its belief that Lo may have shared critical insights about its groundbreaking 2nm process, which is projected to be the most advanced technology in the semiconductor industry in terms of density and energy efficiency when launched. The process is notable for its first-generation nanosheet transistor technology, which promises significant enhancements in performance and power consumption.
Lo retired from his position as Senior Vice President for Corporate Strategy Development at TSMC in July 2023, shortly before accepting his new role at Intel. In light of the allegations, TSMC is reportedly pursuing legal action against Lo, and he is currently under investigation by Taiwanese prosecutors.
In a related move, TSMC has intensified its efforts to protect its intellectual property. In August 2023, the company reportedly dismissed staff members for attempting to access confidential information related to the 2nm process. TSMC’s commitment to securing its upcoming technologies underscores the competitive landscape within the semiconductor industry, where advancements can have far-reaching implications for market position.
The unfolding situation between Intel and TSMC highlights the growing tensions in the semiconductor sector, where competition for technological supremacy is fierce. As these major players navigate the complexities of talent movement and intellectual property rights, the outcome of this case could have significant ramifications for both companies and the industry at large.
