UPDATE: Controversial remarks from Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth have resurfaced following allegations of a shocking verbal order to “kill everyone” during a September 2, 2023 Naval strike on a suspected drug trafficking boat in the Caribbean Sea. This revelation, reported by the Washington Post, has ignited intense scrutiny over military protocols and engagement rules.
In a speech to top military officials, Hegseth condemned what he called “stupid rules of engagement,” advocating for greater autonomy for U.S. forces. “We fight to win. We also don’t fight with stupid rules of engagement,” he declared to an audience of over 800 flag officers. His comments come just weeks after the controversial strike, casting a shadow over military operations and raising ethical questions.
Legal experts are now weighing in, suggesting Hegseth’s alleged order could constitute a war crime. Former military lawyer Todd Huntley stated, “An order to show no quarter would be a war crime,” emphasizing that the lack of a legitimate war raises serious legal implications. The Pentagon has confirmed that recent operations have resulted in at least 80 casualties, further complicating the narrative surrounding these military actions.
The Trump administration defended the strikes by framing them as part of a “non-international armed conflict” with designated terrorist organizations. However, this justification has drawn bipartisan criticism, with lawmakers demanding clarity and accountability regarding the strikes. Following the initial attack, Vice Admiral Frank Bradley reportedly ordered the elimination of two survivors, claiming they posed a potential threat by being able to communicate with other traffickers.
Since that fateful day, the U.S. has conducted at least 22 additional strikes against suspected drug smuggling operations in the region. The implications of these actions are significant and far-reaching, impacting not only military strategy but also international law and human rights.
As this story continues to develop, attention remains focused on the accountability of military leaders and the potential consequences for those involved in these controversial operations. With legal ramifications hanging in the balance, the situation demands close scrutiny from both lawmakers and the public.
Stay tuned for ongoing updates as this urgent matter unfolds.
