US Must Engage with Global Science to Avoid Innovation Crisis

A recent op-ed by Noubar Afeyan, published on January 29, 2024, emphasizes the urgent need for the United States to remain engaged with the global scientific community. In his article titled “Science at risk: Massachusetts must lead the fight for facts,” Afeyan warns that failure to do so could result in the nation becoming an “innovation desert,” dependent on other countries for vital advancements in medicine and technology.

Afeyan argues that the current trajectory could lead to a significant loss of absorptive capacity, which refers to the ability to understand and leverage scientific advancements developed abroad. He asserts that without this capacity, the U.S. risks falling behind in innovation, which could have catastrophic consequences for its economy and social well-being.

Importance of Basic Science

Afeyan stresses the critical role of basic science as the foundation for future innovations. He contends that it is essential for maintaining the competitive edge of the United States. As he points out, basic scientific research is akin to “seed corn,” necessary for nurturing the growth of new technologies and solutions that can drive the country forward.

The repercussions of neglecting this field could extend beyond the scientific community, affecting industries that rely on cutting-edge research and development. In a world increasingly interconnected through technology and information, the U.S. must prioritize its commitment to research and collaboration.

The Call to Action

In his op-ed, Martin G. Evans from Cambridge echoes Afeyan’s sentiments, urging Massachusetts and other states to lead the charge in advocating for science-based policies. He emphasizes that the time for action is now, as the risks of isolation are becoming more pronounced.

Evans highlights the necessity for educational institutions and policymakers to foster environments that encourage scientific exploration and collaboration. By investing in research and building partnerships with international scientific communities, the U.S. can ensure that it does not fall behind in the race for innovation.

The stakes are high, and the message from both Afeyan and Evans is clear: the United States must not retreat from the global stage of science. Instead, it should actively engage with other nations to harness the full potential of scientific advancements. By doing so, the U.S. can safeguard its future as a leader in innovation and technology.